A few years ago, copywriters were panicking that digital was going to kill publishing. We needn't have worried, as digital turned every brand into a newsroom, making us hot property.
With power firmly in the customer hands and budgets tightening, content became the best way to add value and do everything sexy above-the-line marketing does, for cheap.
Even though it solves the problem of selling to a jaded and cynical population without selling, most brands are behind the curve on how to do this effectively. I mean, I don't browse the B&Q content hub for shits and giggles. And I don't necessarily convert.
Show me the money
My ideological situation would be that businesses run with the good of the people and planet at its heart, not money. But this is a capitalist system, so everything is about the spondulics.
Nice tightbody processes
Sorry for the Patrick Bateman phraseology, but the way he describes waitresses perfectly describes how we should approach processes (but without the kill-y bit). They need to be tight.
Only with this can you deliver on your strategy, ensure your content is always current and performing. And also to assess briefs based on SMART acceptance criteria. That way you avoid damaging the integrity of your brand or waste money continually pumping out dubious dross.
There are also bigger questions like if it aligns with the customer journey and is it filling a content gap to empower customers and aid decision-making, do you have permission to play and is it relevant to your target audience. Then you're onto a winner.
Content doesn't always convert. It's information to:
- Add value to product/service or brand
- Change brand perception
- Educate about products/services
- Build loyalty and improve retention
- Appeal to prospects through brand awareness
- Meeting customer needs
- Boost acquisition